Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01206
Original file (BC 2013 01206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:				DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01206
      COUNSEL: NO
                     			HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His record be corrected to reflect award of the following medals 
or awards:

      1. Air Force Good Conduct Medal with one Silver and one 
Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFGCM w/1S&1BOLC) 
      
      2. Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with four Bronze 
Service Stars (AFEM w/4BSS)
      
      3. Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Medal with two Bronze 
Service Stars (SAEMR w/2BSS))
      

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, does not correctly reflect the requested awards.  

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214, National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) 
Transmittal, MSM w/1OLC Certificate, MSM Order, Service Medal 
Award Verification, Fact Sheet on KLM-SA, and Fact Sheet on KLM 
– Kuwait. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
served from 11 December 1974 to 31 December 1995.  He retired 
effective 1 January 1996 in the grade of master sergeant (E-7) 
after serving 21 years and 20 days on active duty, with 4 years, 
5 months, and 7 days of Foreign Service.  

The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s 
military service record, are contained in the evaluation 
provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at 
Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denying the applicant’s requests for the 
AFGCM w/1S&1BOLCs, SAEMR w/2BSS, and the AFEM w/4BSS.  DPSID 
indicates that after a thorough review of the applicant’s 
official military personnel record and the provided 
documentation, they were able to verify award of the MSM 
w/1BOLC, NCOPMEGR w/2BOLC, and the KLM-SA.  

DPSID states the applicant’s records indicate he received an 
Article 15, under the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military 
Justice (UCMJ) on 8 January 1979, causing his new award period 
for the AFGCM to begin on 9 January 1979 with the time between 
the end of his inclusive period for his first AFGCM and his new 
award to be not credible for award of the AFGCM.  

The applicant’s DD Form 214 indicates he qualified as an expert 
marksman with both the rifle and pistol; however, there is no 
provision for additional service stars for the SAEMR.  
Therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct in regard to his award of 
the SAEMR w/1BSS. 

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the AFEM w/2BSS.  
Their office was unable to locate official documentation in his 
records verifying he participated in two additional operations 
to make him eligible for award of the AFEM w/4BSS. 

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 May 2013 for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received no 
response.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to do so.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice in regard to 
the applicant’s request for award of the AFGCM w/1S & 1BOLC, 
AFEM w/4BSS, and the SAEMR w/2BSS.  We took careful notice of 
the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the 
case and find that he has not provided any documentary evidence 
to substantiate his claim that he meets the criteria for these 
awards.  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief beyond 
that already administratively granted is not warranted.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to favorably consider this application.  

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01206 in Executive Session on 12 December 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                       , Panel Chair
	                       , Member
	                       , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01206:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Mar 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 13 May 13. 
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 May 13.




                  
Panel Chair
2

3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00153

    Original file (BC 2014 00153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00153 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) instead of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) (administratively corrected). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02329

    Original file (BC 2013 02329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AFOUA w/V, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, there was no official evidence showing the applicant was attached or assigned to a unit that received the award. Additionally, in view of the fact that we have determined that there is sufficient evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01200

    Original file (BC-2013-01200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the BSM and AM indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01515

    Original file (BC 2014 01515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/2BSS) (administratively resolved), the Presidential Unit Citation with one Oak Leaf Cluster (PUC w/1OLC) (administratively resolved), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Medal (RVNGC w/P) (administratively resolved), and the Cold War Medal and any other awards he may be entitled to. As for his request for the PUC w/1BOLC, the VSM w/2BSS and the RVNGC w/P, a review of the applicant’s records revealed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00543

    Original file (BC 2014 00543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00543 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect the following awards: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibit C. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00239

    Original file (BC-2013-00239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not reflect the appropriate awards, medals, and ribbons. AFPC/DPSID was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the AFOUA w/V and 1 Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/V & 1 BOLC), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/4 BSS), SAEMR, RVNGC w/P, and the VCM, and has administratively corrected his records to reflect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03232

    Original file (BC 2013 03232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medal is awarded to enlisted personnel during a three year period of active military service or for a one year period of service during a time of war. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01112

    Original file (BC 2014 01112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPSOR administratively corrected the applicant’s record to reflect award of the AFAM, w/1BOLC, the AFOUA, w/2BOLCs, the AFGCM, w/1BOLC, KDSM, and the SAEMR. The applicant’s record has been administratively corrected to reflect award of the AFAM, w/1BOLC, the AFOUA, w/2BOLCs, the AFGCM, w/1BOLC, KDSM, and the SAEMR as requested. After careful review of his record, it has been determined that there are no errors regarding evaluations in his record.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01894

    Original file (BC 2013 01894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01894 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). DPSID states that according to the...